野生動(dòng)物是否應(yīng)該被保護(hù)的題目最近又一次被雅思寫(xiě)作提及，對(duì)于這類表達(dá)同意或者反對(duì)的題目，一邊倒的寫(xiě)法應(yīng)該怎樣寫(xiě)，完全反對(duì)該怎么寫(xiě)? 下面雅思小編帶大家梳理雅思寫(xiě)作中動(dòng)物類一邊倒文章的寫(xiě)法。
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
第一個(gè)步驟是決定同不同意，還是部分同意。我的建議是完全不同意。我不認(rèn)為這個(gè)題目我們可以選部分同意。
接下來(lái)，讓我們組織一下四段的內(nèi)容：
1.開(kāi)頭段： 題目復(fù)述(保護(hù)動(dòng)物正確的)，然后回答問(wèn)題(完全不同意)
2.第一段理由：為什么不同意。比如說(shuō)保護(hù)動(dòng)物是我們的責(zé)任,動(dòng)物有生活在地球上的權(quán)利
3.第二段理由： 為什么不同意。比如說(shuō)我們用很多資源去保護(hù)動(dòng)物，但這并不算浪費(fèi)資源
4.總結(jié)段: 重復(fù)觀點(diǎn)/總結(jié)我們的答案
OK.接下來(lái)是最重要的了：論點(diǎn)。你能想想第二段第三段我們能列舉哪些論據(jù)嗎?
給你一個(gè)開(kāi)頭段的范例：
開(kāi)頭段(話題+一般性答案)
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
總結(jié)段(重申我們的答案)
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
請(qǐng)注意:
開(kāi)頭段和總結(jié)段要短小精悍，直截了當(dāng)。如果你要得高分，要在主體段兩段下功夫。
下面是9分范文：
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century,so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion,it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world`s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources.It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.