關(guān)于“茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)”評獎(jiǎng)的思考

摘   要

茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)的評獎(jiǎng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)包括文學(xué)因素和非文學(xué)因素。茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)對中國文壇產(chǎn)生了積極影響，作出了重要貢獻(xiàn)。茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)評獎(jiǎng)存在著不合理的需要改進(jìn)的方面包括：茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)評獎(jiǎng)的評委組成、評選程序、對文學(xué)精品的認(rèn)識問題等。針對茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)存在的缺陷，應(yīng)對茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)的評選作進(jìn)1步的改進(jìn)，以發(fā)揮茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)對文學(xué)創(chuàng)作的激勵(lì)和引領(lǐng)作用，使茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)的評選具有更多的公信力和更高的威望。
    關(guān)鍵詞：茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)；評獎(jiǎng)；思考
 

ABSTRACT
 
The appraisal standards of MaoDun Literary Prize comprises the literary and nonliterary facts. The positive effects and great contribution of MaoDun Literary Prize on Chinese literary circles are affirmed, and the point of view that MaoDun Literary Prize still needs improvement is expressed. Suggestions are for the constitute of the evaluation committee, procedure of the evaluation committee, awareness of the top quality novels. Through the above discussions on its effects and limitations, this paper intends to accelerate the leading and encouraging function of MaoDun Literary Prize on literary works, and make it more credible.
    Key words: Mao Dun literature prize; Appraisal; Ponder

 

【“茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)”評獎(jiǎng)的思考】相關(guān)文章：

語言文學(xué)畢業(yè)論文-關(guān)于“茅盾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)”評獎(jiǎng)的思考03-04

關(guān)于國學(xué)的思考12-05

非婚同居的法律思考03-13

對舞蹈教育的多元思考03-07

關(guān)于“國學(xué)熱”的思考03-07

對培養(yǎng)審計(jì)人才的思考03-08

對品牌授權(quán)經(jīng)營的思考03-18

極限思想的辯證思考03-07

淺談藥師立法的思考03-24